1. Background
For optical communication silicon lens inspection equipment, there are leading representatives from both domestic and international markets:
This article provides a side-by-side comparison of the core differences between the two solutions to help you make an informed decision.
2. Technical Parameter Comparison
| Parameter | Qiuhao R300 (Domestic, MCZX) | Zygo (Imported) | Notes |
|---|
| Single Capture Time | 1 second | 5 seconds | The R300 is 4–6 times faster |
| Measurement Mode | Laser Confocal, Non-Scanning Imaging | White Light Interferometry, Scanning + Multi-Mode | Non-scanning imaging delivers higher throughput |
| Working Distance | Long | Medium | The R300 is better suited for industrial environments |
3. On-Site Speed Test
Test Scenario: Alternating inspection of 6-inch and 8-inch silicon lenses, with a baseline volume of 15–20 units per day.
| Metric | Qiuhao R300 | Zygo |
|---|
| Time per Unit | 1 second | 5 seconds |
| Total Time for 50,000 Units | ~1.3 hours | ~6.5 hours |
| Inspection Mode | 100% full inspection with ease | Sampling inspection or overtime required |
| Efficiency Gap | Benchmark | 4–6 times slower |
Conclusion: Speed is the defining difference. The Qiuhao R300 supports full production inspection, while the Zygo is limited to sampling due to throughput constraints.
4. Service & Support Comparison
| Metric | Qiuhao R300 | Zygo |
|---|
| Response Time | 48 hours | 2–4 weeks |
| Spare Parts Supply | Local stock, 3–5 days | Imported, 1–3 weeks |
| Technical Engineers | Domestic service network | Requires overseas dispatch |
| Downtime Cost | Extremely low | Extremely high |
5. Comprehensive Evaluation
| Dimension | Qiuhao R300 Advantage | Zygo Advantage |
|---|
| Accuracy | Meets industrial-grade requirements | More suitable for high-precision R&D applications |
| Speed | 1 second per unit | 5 seconds per unit |
| Service | 48-hour rapid response | 1–2 week response |
6. Selection Recommendations
Choose the Qiuhao R300 (MCZX) if you have:
High daily throughput (up to 86,400 units/day), with alternating 6-inch and 8-inch silicon lenses
Production lines that cannot tolerate long downtime
Industrial applications requiring ~1μm accuracy
Procurement decisions focused on cost-performance ratio
Choose the Zygo if you have:
R&D-level accuracy requirements (<0.5μm)
R&D laboratories with diverse sample types
Low daily inspection volume (<10,000 units/day)
MCZX (Mingcha Zhixin) specializes in industrial vision inspection. Official website: http://bevs.me
- Share
-
12
- Which Silicon Lens Inspection Device Is Better? Field Test Comparison: Sensofar vs Domestic Flagship vs Bruker
- Silicon Lens Inspection Equipment Selection Guide: In-depth Analysis of 0.1s Fastest Measurement Solution