1. Case Background: 100,000 Silicon Lenses Need Shipment Within 72 Hours, Inspection Becomes Production Bottleneck
An optical communication component manufacturer received an urgent order for 100,000 silicon lenses with a 72-hour delivery deadline. While production capacity met the schedule, the full-inspection procedure dragged down the whole project.The factory previously adopted Zygo NewView optical profilometer, which spends around 5 seconds for single-part measurement. Total measuring time for all parts would take hundreds of hours, excluding extra time for manual loading/unloading, focusing and sample positioning.
2. Zygo vs Domestic Flagship: How Big Is the Gap in Testing Speed?
Zygo NewView Series: Equipped with white-light interferometry, it finishes measurement within several seconds per field of view. Featuring nanometer-level precision and proven mature technology, it has long been the industry benchmark.Qiuhao R300 from MCZX(Mingcha Zhixin): Adopts non-scanning laser interferometry imaging, completing full-field measurement in only 1 second. It delivers identical nanoscale precision while running 4~6 times faster than Zygo. Actual mass-testing data for silicon lenses (testing items: surface roughness + surface form error):
Zygo NewView: Hundreds of total working hours
MCZX Qiuhao R300: Around 30 hours (1s per spot plus data transmission)Efficiency gap: 5x higher for domestic equipment
3. Core Reason for Speed Difference: Scanning vs Non-Scanning Technology
Zygo uses white-light interferometry plus vertical scanning workflow: Z-axis mechanical movement → continuous camera shooting → image stacking → 3D topography reconstruction via algorithm. Total testing duration rises along with the height variation of tested samples.MCZX Qiuhao R300 applies non-scanning laser interferometry: one single exposure generates complete full-field 3D point cloud directly. No Z-axis mechanical movement exists, so sample height fluctuation never affects testing speed. Simply put: Zygo works like "recording a video then synthesizing final image", while Qiuhao R300 captures full 3D data with just one snapshot.
4. When Testing Speed Decides Equipment Selection?
Testing speed turns into a critical procurement indicator under three mass-production scenarios:Scenario1: Full-inspection for bulk mass productionDaily output over 10,000pcs requires mandatory full inspection for quality control. Zygo’s multi-second measuring speed cannot match production tact time, whereas the fast response of MCZX Qiuhao R300 fits inline full inspection perfectly.Scenario2: Frequent production changeover for diversified small batchesFrequent model switching needs repeated calibration and positioning for Zygo, whose long scanning time further lowers overall line efficiency. Benefiting from non-scanning design, MCZX Qiuhao R300 supports instant testing after model replacement.
5. In Which Cases Is Zygo Still the Better Option?
Zygo remains a reliable pick when daily testing volume is under 10,000 pieces or samples cover drastically varied surfaces (from ultra-smooth mirror finish to rough blasted surface), thanks to its multi-mode switching function, complete software ecosystem and widely recognized industry reputation.MCZX Qiuhao R300 is designed for maximum efficiency on fixed bulk products such as silicon lenses, optical flats and semiconductor wafers, where faster inspection directly improves factory ROI.
6. Conclusion
Zygo and MCZX Qiuhao R300 are complementary rather than mutually exclusive:
R&D & high-precision lab testing → Zygo NewView
Mass manufacturing & high-throughput full inspection → Qiuhao R300 by MCZX
For silicon lens manufacturers, MCZX Qiuhao R300 upgrades quality control from spot-check to full inline inspection and eliminates inspection bottlenecks entirely.MCZX specializes in industrial machine vision inspection, official website: http://bevs.me
- Share
-
12
- Silicon Lens & Lens Array Detection: White Light Interferometry vs Laser Interferometry Application Analysis
- Silicon Lens Inspection Equipment Review: Imported vs Domestic Brands